Category: Uncategorized

  • September Executive Meeting

    September Executive Meeting

    If you’re looking for a window into decision making at Trafford Council, the Executive Meeting of the council is the best place to start.

    Whilst meetings of full council in the Town Hall chamber are designed for performative political bun fights, the meeting of the Executive at least ostensibly focuses on officer written reports requiring approval.

    I thought I’d write this piece as my previous post was on the single issue of the coming expiry of Sale Waterside’s PFI contract. That is but one of the agenda items at a busy first Executive meeting following the summer recess, and it’s certainly not the only matter of interest.

    So, other than the Waterside PFI, what’s on the agenda?

    Greater Manchester End to End Fostering Recruitment Hub

    Fostering is a critical element of Trafford’s children’s services. It was hard not to pick up this was also an area to which a lot of feedback was negative in terms of the reaction to Trafford’s inadequate rating.

    This report seeks Executive approval in principle for Trafford Council to participate in the Greater Manchester End-to-End Fostering Hub, which will expand the existing regional fostering recruitment hub into a service responsible for recruitment, assessment and approval of mainstream foster carers across Greater Manchester.

    The proposed model would transfer some fostering recruitment, assessment and approval functions to the Hub, whilst Trafford would retain responsibility for foster carer support and supervision, annual reviews, kinship fostering assessments and its wider statutory duties in relation to children in its care.


    Thoughts

    On the face of it, the project seems sensible. I would have liked formal input from the Trafford Foster Care Association. The report mentions that they’ve been briefed, but doesn’t provide any input from them. Given Ofsted’s judgement of Trafford’s provision as inadequate, it’s not reassuring for the report not to include user feedback.

    Corporate Plan Performance 25/26

    The council measures its performance against key indicators. These should really chart progress towards the Council Vision. I’m not a huge fan of corporate visions in general. Tom Ross and I took opposing positions on Trafford’s corporate vision.

    My view on the Trafford Vision

    If we cancelled every training session on corporate visions, it would be the easiest win on productivity we’re ever likely to make.

    Tom’s View

    Trafford – where all our residents, communities and businesses thrive

    I guess I was never a natural manager. I knew what a good piece of work was and it never seemed to need input from a corporate vision to enhance it.

    I’m being flippant, and even if Trafford’s seems vague and unobtainable, I’d still rather have it than Kellogg’s vision.

    A good and just world where people are not just fed but fulfilled.

    That’s Rice Krispies, right?

    I digress

    Back to Trafford, and I’m sure there’ll be some challenge from opposition parties on performance indicators in the red (below).

    • 16/17 Neet %
    • EHCP completion
    • Children referred for 2nd time Protection
    • Family Help re-referral rates
    • Early Years Attainment Gap
    • Improved conversion rate for Adults Safeguarding
    • Proportion of people using social care direct payments
    • Household Waste collected for Composting
    • Proportion of journeys undertaken by bike or on foot
    • Library loans
    • Staff sickness

    Link to Full report

    I always think these reports should be an opportunity to take a broad look across the council. For instance, it would be really useful for the executive not just to take stock of performance indicators, but things like staff morale and staff retention. Data is routinely collected and reported on within the NHS, but they rarely get beyond Employment committee in Trafford.

    Budget Monitoring

    Given that Trafford required a capitalisation directive from the Government to allow it borrow up to £12.6m to support the revenue budget it’s vital that a close eye is kept on spending this year.

    As it stands, Trafford is projected to overspend by £2.78m. It’s not untypical for this to be the case in September. They’ll want to keep an eye on it but it’s not the time for panic.

    Co-incidentally, Trafford has be awarded £7.5m by the Ministry of housing, community and local government (MHCLG) this week as part of a package to those councils who’ve had to apply for special arrangements to balance the budget. Ostensibly, it’s for efficiencies.

    In Trafford using better technology, including AI, to make services smarter and easier for residents. This includes moving to a modern, more reliable computer system that brings all the council’s information together in one place, so different teams can work together more easily and give people better support when they need it, such as when applying for services or reporting an issue.

    Trafford and IT systems is an interesting subject. I’ll believe in the modern AI powered modern computer system when I see it.

    Budget Monitoring Report

    Sustainable Transport & Environment Board

    This is a new committee. It’s long overdue. Trafford has never taken public transport seriously whilst council’s like Stockport and Bolton have seen it as absolutely key to prosperity.

    Trafford Park Business Improvement District

    Business Improvement Districts can be very successful if businesses in an area have shared vision for improving things within its boundary. They tend to work around town centres, but having one in Trafford Park would be really interesting if it got going. The idea’s been around for over a decade but maybe the time is right for it to proceed.

    Trafford Park Business Improvement District

    Elected Members Social Media Guide

    I thought councillors already had a social media guide. In any event, they’ve got one now.

    Link to Social Media Guide

    It’s perhaps a good moment to flag that I’ve been blocked by Trafford’s Conservatives on Facebook. I’m guessing this was for pointing out they were just wrong on council tax rises.

    They shouldn’t be blocking people for that if that’s why they’ve done it. It suggests they want to deliberately misinform. I rarely comment on Conservative posts unless they’ve put something that’s verifiably untrue, as in this case, or more pertinently, I agree with them.

    I think in twenty years, I’ve only blocked one person and I’ve only deleted when not to do so could get me into legal hot water.

    That said, even if it hasn’t happened to me, social media can be difficult and it can get out of hand.

    I still wouldn’t turn the clock back on it though. It’s still an incredibly useful way to engage.

    Other items

    There’s a couple of items that have been brought about by changes to national rules

    Renters’ Rights

    Planning Committee Reform – making more applications for officer determination. Losing the ability to call-in applications. You are going to see less applications going to committee. The council does not have a choice in this.

    What’s not coming to Executive committee

    I’m really shocked that the two critical inspections are not on this agenda. Whilst issues are already being dealt with, I would still expect the Executive to receive a formal report of the process.

    Executive Committee Behaviour

    Since Executive meetings are chaired by the Leader of the council they can be just as performative as the main council. We saw this last year that the meetings can be subject to the lowest of stunts, when opposition parties were subjected to having to deliver serious questions from a wobbly kitchen table. I’m just an ordinary resident now. I don’t want to see childish shenanigans from the leadership.

    I’d love your feedback

    I do this because I enjoy it, but that doesn’t mean I’m only interested in my point of view.

    Please tell me I’m right, tell me I’m wrong.

    Oh and don’t forget you can subscribe to an email whenever I post.

  • Sale Waterside to be bought out of the PFI

    Sale Waterside to be bought out of the PFI

    Sale Waterside is a well regarded suburban arts centre in Sale. The complex also includes Sale Library and a large amount of office space that is primarily used by Trafford Council. There’s also the (now closed) Slug and Lettuce and the Caldo Lounge.

    The complex was developed under a PFI arrangement and opened in 2004. The PFI arrangement to which Trafford entered into paid a charge to the contractor. This is coming to an end and the Trafford Council Executive has to take a decision

    The options are:

    Option A

    Exit the contract and take back the complex for the final “bullet” payment in the contract. Agree to purchase the 2 commercial units for their open market value.

    Option B

    Exit the PFI asset in October 2028, leaving the facility in the PFI contractor ownership.

    The Council has performed a financial analysis, including a valuation of the building, the exit payment and operating costs, and the recommendation is to take back the building and make the final payment to Equans. The recommendation is also to acquire the two commercial units at open market value. Details of this are outlined in the part 2 (restricted) report.

    Thoughts

    Even allowing for the fact that the commercial/financial data is closed to the public, it does feel as though only a shallow consideration has been taken.

    There’s apparently 400 council desks at Waterside. Is it in the council’s interest to maintain that. I’ve got to be honest, I was surprised by the number. Is it time to start consolidating our office space? I think we also need to ask the extent to which our presence is good for Sale Town Centre. This is a prime site in Sale. I am surprised that the vibrancy of this quarter has been allowed to slide.

    Clearly, I’m not questioning the presence of the library and theatre and it may be that the only way to ensure continuity is the purchase option. I’d be surprised if this was the case and that the library and theatre were part of this deal. They’re not explicitly mentioned. We’re over a barrel if they are!

    I think overall, I’d have liked scrutiny to take a broad look at the options before taking a decision. There’s a risk that back in Trafford’s ownership, we can’t maintain the premises to a standard that benefits Sale and we end up in a worse situation. These are not luxury offices. The risks mentioned in the report seem so superficial. It just seems a less than thorough options appraisal.

    I’d really be pleased to hear your thoughts on this as I think I’m just scratching at the surface.

    Sale Waterside Complex by N Chadwick, CC BY-SA 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

  • Not Good – Inspections of key services confirm Trafford’s worst fears

    Not Good – Inspections of key services confirm Trafford’s worst fears

    Adult and Children’s inspection Reports across Greater Manchester

    Adult Social CareChildren’s Services
    BoltonGoodFeb26GoodSep23
    BuryGoodJun26Requires ImprovementJun25
    ManchesterGoodAug26OutstandingOct25
    OldhamGoodFeb26GoodMay24
    RochdaleGoodJun26Requires ImprovementFeb23
    SalfordInadequateMay26GoodNov23
    StockportGoodMay26Requires ImprovementMay25
    TamesideRequires ImprovementJun26InadequateDec23
    TraffordRequires ImprovementAug26InadequateJun26
    WiganOutstandingMar26GoodOct25

    Trafford has found itself in the unenviable position of receiving two critical inspection reports in quick succession. There’s been a political furore and urgent meetings in the middle of August have had to be scheduled.

    Adult Social Services

    Because all of Greater Manchester’s Adult Services have been inspected in quick succession, I think it’s useful to compare these across Greater Manchester.

    Most of our neighbours have been rated as ‘Good’.

    Wigan are rated as ‘Outstanding’.

    Salford have been given an ‘Inadequate’ mark.

    That leaves Tameside and Trafford as ‘Requiring Improvement’.

    Children’s Services

    The inspections into Children’s Services have been taking place over a much longer period going back to 2023. Trafford is the only Greater Manchester Council that’s had an inspection this year. Trafford’s Children’s Services have been rated as inadequate.

    The opening paragraph of the inspection report is corruscating.

    Since the previous inspection in 2022, when services in Trafford were judged as requires improvement to be good, leaders have been ineffective in recognising, prioritising and making improvements to some service shortfalls.

    Practice with children in care and for some care-experienced young people has improved, but there has been a serious deterioration in service areas, such as front door response. This has left some children at risk of harm.

    This is serious. Yes, there’s some positive comments in sections of the report, but those opening paragraphs are damning.


    But surely Tameside is in the same place as Trafford?

    It’s true that Tameside has received the same combination, but the three year time lapse has made it noticeably less febrile there. Maybe, that’s somewhat unfair, but we can’t make Tameside react differently.

    So, where does that leave us?

    Trafford have issued a public response to the Ofsted report.

    Work is already under way to strengthen children’s services.

    … improving decision-making and management oversight at the Front Door, where contacts and referrals are first received and assessed…

    …focusing on specific areas identified in the inspection, the response to children at risk of significant harm, safety planning, support for 16 and 17 year old homeless children, young carers…

    Democratic oversight will be provided by the Children’s Scrutiny Committee.

    I welcome the involvement of Scrutiny. Shirley Procter as chair of Children’s scrutiny has a wealth of experience of children’s services. There is no one better to run with this.

    However, I can’t help reflecting on the council’s suspension of all scrutiny for a big part of last year. I hope the leadership will reflect on their tendency to close down oversight whenever there’s opportunity. I suspect scrutiny would have brought some of these issues to the fore ahead of Ofsted.

    The speed with which questioning of the Executive was suppressed during the Mayoral election suggests the openness promised in the response may not be observed in practice. This is not a council executive characterised by its inclusive governance.

    The Extraordinary Council Meetings

    The Council Meeting will take place on the 26th August, the meeting of Children’s scrutiny precedes it on the 25th. Of the two, the scrutiny is likely to be by far the more constructive. It really depends how open the Executive is to its shortcomings, and to the extent to which it is receptive to advice.

    The Conservatives have already made it clear that they are pursuing the resignation of the Labour Leader, Tom Ross, at the Council Meeting.

    Is there a case for resignations?

    The objective argument is whether the resignation of the leader allows a more proactive examination of how to deliver these services to the required standard.

    I don’t think one ought to be sentimental about this. I’ve seen leaders hang on when circumstances conspire. It’s the party that loses as a consequence.

    A shift to inclusivity might well entail some changes to personnel. However, I don’t think it will happen. In fact, the Tory approach makes even less likely to happen. The council will divide on party lines and the leadership will receive a vote of confidence.

    That potential vote of confidence is troubling. You can’t draw a simple line under a verdict that ‘there has been a serious deterioration in service areas, such as front door response. This has left some children at risk of harm.’

    I would prefer the Conservatives to avoid a vote on resignations. They are entitled to make capital. It ought to be an opportunity for constructive input.

    Can we be assured that the risk of harm will be mitigated?

    The inspection has provoked a response across social media from carers and young people that have interacted with children’s services. I wouldn’t call it an explosion, but there’s certainly been some.

    We really need the voices of people who’ve been engaged with Children’s Services to be heard. They won’t be served by a political bun fight and obfuscation.

    We really need to be shining a light on how things are put right. The risk is that the opposite will happen and the matter is locked down.

  • I care!

    I care!

    A leader that gives every sign he thinks that rules are for suckers is the last thing this country needs.

    Laurie Noble, CC BY 3.0 , via Wikimedia Commons link

  • Whoah! Hold your horses!

    Whoah! Hold your horses!

    Keir Starmer will not be the leader of the Labour Party at the next election!

    That question seems to be settled. I’m not sure anything else is sorted, nor should it be. Why the rush into the unknown?

    Everyone knows that Andy Burnham wants the job. Everyone knows that Wes Streeting wants the job. It seems clear that Andy Burnham would win a contest within the Parliamentary Labour Party. It’s not clear that Andy Burnham wants a contest.

    Keir Starmer is considering his position.

    This could get very messy

    The only person that can really dictate the process is Keir Starmer and we really need for him to put his foot down….firmly!

    Neither Andy Burnham, nor Wes Streeting, nor indeed any other candidate, is in any position to hit the ground running.

    Starmer is the only one who can hold it together until they are ready

    Starmer needs to accept that he’s going to have to handover when the successor is chosen and they’re ready to go.

    There’s no reason that Starmer can’t invite all declared candidates to start the preparatory work before the contest begins. In fact, I think he should insist upon it. He should instruct his ministers to be completely open and give as much access as is possible.

    The end of that process is the time for the party to choose the leader, and the party can test their readiness to take over.

    I’m no longer a member, but I trust the membership once there are programmes for Government that can be put to them.

    collage of images – all creative commons from wikimedia.

  • Just to be different!

    Just to be different!

    Good News!

    LabourList, the independent platform for Labour supporters, published its roundup of positive news this morning.

    Despite the challenging times for Labour, the update is surprisingly encouraging.

    The LabourList summary highlights several promising initiatives that show why having a Labour Government matters:

    • Proposals to protect unmarried couples by ensuring access to shared property and inheritance rights, addressing the current lack of financial safeguards when relationships end, which often leaves vulnerable individuals—especially survivors of domestic abuse—at risk.
    • Plans to double the maximum duration of closure orders for dodgy high street shops.
    • Measures requiring tech companies to automatically block nude images on children’s smartphones and tablets by default.
    • A £20 million investment enabling high street opticians to refer patients directly to NHS hospital eye services.

    And it doesn’t stop there.

    This morning the government announced a £4.5 billion plan to expand walking, wheeling and cycling, aiming to build 5,000 new active‑travel routes, install 10,000 safer crossings, and shift more everyday journeys—especially school runs—away from cars.

    • Delivering this will save households money, including up to £1,700 per year if a second car is replaced with active travel for short trips
    • Improve public health, potentially freeing up 1.7 million GP appointments and reducing 4.4 million sick days annually
    • Cut carbon emissions and reduce congestion
    • Boost local economies through healthier, more connected communities.

    Locally, the emphasis on walkability fits very well with Stretford’s resurgence and indeed Urmston’s long term prosperity. Urban centres are increasingly the biggest gainers from trends towards local provision.

    So, in this vein, last night’s Planning Committee welcomed the application for Grub’s open food hall application in Stretford. The assumption was very much on a walkable destination.

    And lastly, keeping up the positive news, I was delighted to see that our hospital trust MFT, which runs most of our hospital facilities in Trafford and Manchester including Trafford General, Manchester Royal Infirmary and Wythenshawe Hospital amongst others has in the words of Manchester Evening News surged up the rankings.

    I have a personal reason for taking particular pleasure in MFT’s improved performance having served as a governor of the trust for the past three years. So I know how hard everyone within the trust has worked to achieve this. Big congratulations to everyone xxx

    (It looks like I am soon to submit to a major procedure in the hands of the trust, so I need to be nice haha)

    Featured Image: “Can you guess which house the Manchester City fans live in?” by Dunk 🐝, CC BY 2.0 gently cropped