Category: Blog

  • 2017 Election – The agent’s perspective

    2017 Election – The agent’s perspective

    18th April 11am – Anne Duffield calls me “Have you seen the news? Theresa is going for the 8th June!”

    “Oh ****!”

    We’re already campaigning hard for Andy Burnham for Mayor and over in Altrincham for a council by-election. The polls are abysmal; and worse… I’m on record as wanting an early General Election.

    I’ve been the lone voice arguing for months that Labour should be on the front foot demanding Theresa May calls an early election.

    The Tories haven’t got a mandate for the Brexit they’re pursuing and the electorate needs to speak. Theresa May is effectively using the same argument, except we’re on the back-foot. The polls are just about as bad they could be.

    As parliament is still sitting, we won’t see Kate until the weekend.

    Meanwhile, the media are on hyperdrive, searching for stories of discord, or making them up. We don’t yet know how the party will confirm candidates. The assumption is that it’ll be straight-forward, but the press are hoping for something more messy.

    It turns out that even losing candidates from 2015 will be able to be a candidate again in 2017 without a full selection. Not totally convinced that this is the right approach.

    Clearly we haven’t the resources or time to go through a full selection everywhere. but where the candidate lost, I think it’s reasonable to ask the question whether someone else could do better. The Tories strangely seem to be in the same predicament. I use the word ‘strangely’ since they called the election, yet they don’t seem ready for it.

    By the first weekend, we’re pretty much set. Kate had indicated who her campaign team would be long before the election was called. Me as agent, Tom as campaign manager, Ita and Bernice running members/distribution and Morris Hall.

    We just need to settle on a campaign budget. I’m figuring that as things stand, it’s going to have to be more than last time (2015) when we were twinned to help Warrington South and additionally the general election coincided with local elections.

    The polls are far worse and we’re on our own as far as a twinning strategy is concerned. Kate is extremely popular, Tory run Trafford Council is extremely unpopular, and deservedly so, particularly in the north of the borough.

    We’re hearing some voters saying they won’t vote Labour because of Jeremy Corbyn, others are enthusiastic because of him. The bottom line is that the polls put us at our lowest for a generation, which suggests we’ll have to work for every vote.

    Our membership is huge, we’ve got recently joined members who are full of energy and determination. We’ve got a common goal of winning as many seats as possible. Labour is an incredibly powerful force when it pulls together, so there’s a real onus on the campaign to be inclusive and not to operate in cliques.

    We need to get Broadheath by-election out of the way, so we can begin a bit of canvassing. Tom can begin drafting and getting the orders in for our leaftlets etc.

    I’m keen that we start using the doorstep app which is a canvassing tool for smartphones. I’ve been on a few canvass sessions in Broadheath where we have had so many helpers that I’ve found I’ve spent most of the time waiting to be allocated a door to knock or waiting to have the info recorded. It just seems obvious to me that having the info on a phone means I could just be getting on with it.

    Others are sceptical. I get consent to try it out in Gorse Hill Ward.

    First time on the Doorstep App, it doesn’t work. I can’t log in.

    Second time, it’s me and Kate on Auburn Ave in Lostock. We operate like overlapping fullbacks and the app works perfectly. If we’d had to share a clipboard, it would have been slow going. Too big a team and it’s easy to just chat to other canvassers. Too small and it’s the person with the board with nothing to do.

    It’s good that Kate is an early adopter of the technology. Without her blessing I doubt we’d have used it to such good effect throughout the campaign. The ‘App’ became a big thing here in this campaign, in other constituencies, less so.

    By election Broadheath / Andy Burnham Mayor May 4

    Suddenly everything looks a little bit rosier. The election of Andy Burnham has been overwhelming across Trafford. He’s won every ward in Stretford and Urmston by a landslide. Amy Whyte has had a fantastic victory in Broadheath. There’s a spring in everyone’s step.

    The Launch

    My next task is to get the official nomination of Kate submitted. But first we need to launch the campaign. A handy place to get the ten signatures we need. I’m dead keen to include newer activists who’ve been working hard both here and in Broadheath. I think we only had one Councillor on the list. I was pleased with the list of people nominating Kate.

    By the way, who’s the Conservative Candidate?

    As nominations open, we still don’t know who the Conservatives have chosen to be their candidate. We know it’s not going to be Sean Anstee because we’ve asked him.

    We know that at least one Trafford Conservative councillor applied to be their candidate in Tatton, and another is candidate in Liverpool Walton but nobody will tell us who their candidate is in Stretford and Urmston. I wouldn’t say we’re panicking over it, but this is new.

    Kate tells me that there’s a feeling amongst colleagues that the Conservative campaign is going to be largely under the radar. We know the Conservatives outspent Labour massively in 2015 on Social Media. Perhaps that’s going to be the nature of this campaign although it seems strange that there’s nothing going on on their local websites.

    Even Thursday’s Messenger hasn’t been given the name of the Tory Candidate although it’s got both the Lib Dems and ours. We eventually confirm that it’s Lisa Cooke who’s been chosen. It’s someone we know since she fought the seat back in 2015 but I’d not heard anything from her since to suggest she was still active in the Conservative Party politics.

    Edit with the Benefit of Hindsight

    Over the next few days, we come to realise that this tactic of making the campaign all about Theresa May rather than individual candidates was pretty much universal. There’s images from all over the country of direct mail sent in the name of the prime minister asking for support. The actual local candidate just gets a brief mention. Given that Theresa May wouldn’t debate or even meet ordinary voters, it is a great relief to myself as a democrat that the tactic would eventually prove so abysmally unsuccessful.

    The mood lifts…

    I guess everyone has their own moment where it began to change. This was mine. Emily Thornbury visibly demolishing and diminishing Michael Fallon on prime telly was the point where I began to think we’re coming back into this.

    Our manifesto has gone down well, the Tory manifesto is a disaster. Unprecedented for U-turns on a manifesto before election day. ‘Nothing has changed, Nothing has changed!’ Theresa May is sinking with her ship.

    Leaflets, stuffing, sorting, Delivering, Phoning

    The pause in the election brought home how much work we’d all been doing. An election campaign is a huge operation even at constituency level. So many people working hard for change.

    We had an incredible amount of people helping Kate and Labour and Jeremy. It was a fantastically unified campaign amongst those taking part. It didn’t matter what wing of the party, or what was the political motivation, we worked together.

    It’s something the Tories will never match

    The Count

    Finally got to see some Tories. Just a few turned up from Stretford and Urmston. We’re pretty sure that they did nothing apart from a single leaflet posted by the Royal Mail.

    Hugely annoyed that their vote went up by a 1000 votes. It sticks in my craw that a party that took so little notice of its own voters during an election should increase its vote.

    Thankfully, Jeremy Corbyn’s/Kate’s/Labour vote increased by nearly 9000 votes. Everyone deserves a share of this. It was similar across Greater Manchester and the North West.

    The picture on the other side of The Pennines seems totally different. My own view is that within Labour, we have many on that side of the country legitimising the Brexit/Ukip message when we should be challenging it. It’s a risky game because the chances are that the east of the country will be worst affected by Brexit.

    swing

    After the election

    The expenses are tallied and submitted. Thankfully we were never a marginal seat with shadow Ministers and Battlebuses dropping in. Thankfully too, I don’t have to reimburse the shoe leather sacrificed by our members and supporters. If we did have to repay all the volunteers I think I’d have been overspent before a single letter was printed. Many thanks too everyone and I’d wholeheartedly recommend it if you ever get the chance to be agent.

  • Just stay in Hospital – Everything’s fine in Trafford

    Just stay in Hospital – Everything’s fine in Trafford

    Things are getting really bad in Trafford!

    The honest assessment as I see it is that Trafford is almost at breaking point.

    You’ve seen the figures that show delayed discharges from hospital put Trafford in the bottom two of the league table for the whole country. Those are real figures, not some tame consultancy’s award.

    Those figures are more indicative of how Trafford is performing than any amount of corporate propaganda. And the effect is shortened lives as we all know.

    This hasn’t happened overnight. It’s been the product of the coalition’s long term economic plan sacrificing local services and Labour’s been shouting it for years.

    Trafford’s problem is that it started the cuts from such a low base. And having Tories in control has meant a culture of denial. Just keep telling everyone that all is well and they won’t notice.

    But senior officers do know and reputationally, the signs are there that working at Trafford is no longer the plum job it once was. All the corporate directors from even five years ago have either left, leaving or have tried to leave. Trafford no longer seems to be attracting the best from outside and increasingly promotes from within, which can work, but obviously lessens its ability to refresh.

    Things are dire. The visible signs are there for all to see It would be easy to put the blame on our private sector ‘partner’, Amey for the state of our roads and parks. Indeed Amey Plc are a symptom of that sort of global private equity me, me, me, greed that’s beset us, but Sean Anstee’s Tories have to take the real blame.

    The Tories have relied upon throwing a few crumbs out to wards they need to keep voting Tory. And they paint an implied, and often explicit threat that because Labour says it will try to be fair in its policies, that will somehow be worse for Tory voters.

    It’s a proven electoral strategy and it doesn’t cost them very much in ‘crumbs’. When you look at Davyhulme, Flixton, Sale, you see it really is crumbs. The cake goes to Hale and Bowdon.

    It’s almost satire that Hale is having millions spent on its new library, Where’s the business case in social value terms, especially given the proximity to Altrincham? – (also getting a new library)

    I’m angry that my town, my neighbourhood is getting such a raw deal. I’m frustrated that that the Flixton and Davyhulme’s don’t demand the same ‘cake’ that goes to Hale and Bowdon. Why don’t they ask where are Flixton and Davyhulme’s libraries? Will there ever be a breaking point?

    I look across at a Tory Party in total denial as to Trafford’s plight.

    Comfortably Numb in their indolence.

    Image: Chatgpt

  • Flixton Fields Council Meeting – Don’t let them tell you it’s about houses

    Flixton Fields Council Meeting – Don’t let them tell you it’s about houses

    On 21st December, Trafford Labour’s Council Meeting we’d called to oppose fields in Flixton being designated for development.

    It was a vital meeting. The submission by Trafford of these fields at Flixton for inclusion within the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework has not been adequately explained. Residents are outraged that something so intrinsically part of Flixton and central to their village is being sacrificed for development.

    A council keeping its residents in the dark

    We need houses and business development. We all agree on that.

    This is not about housing though. We are still not getting the full picture about the Flixton Fields submission. I find it abhorrent that even after the full Council meeting we’re still being strung along. I’ve never heard such specious argument in favour of a proposal. If there is an argument for including Flixton Fields, it certainly is not the one that the Tories are putting forward.

    The insertion of Flixton Fields into the proposal has been blind-side operation by Trafford from the off. Less than two months ago the Greater Manchester Combined Authority published (31st October) the results of its ‘Call for Sites’. As you can see below, the extent to which developers had ambitions on Flixton was minimal.

    Land adjacent to Flixton Station

    Land adjacent to Flixton Station

    At the exact same time this is being published, we also have the Draft Spatial Framework. So the narrative is this:

    We’ve asked you and the Developer Industry to point to sites you think should be built upon,
    and you gave us this.
    But, we don’t want to give you that, we want to give you this;
    and its for your own protection!

    Listen to Sean Anstee on the video of the council meeting (about 12mins in). The amount of times he talks in terms of doing this to control the insatiable hunger of developers, to make sure we get the infrastructure, schools, highways, public transport in place first etc. You need to remind yourself that this hasn’t been put forward by developers, then remind yourself who the landowner is. Nothing can happen unless the council chooses to sell, but it’s the council who is both the proposer and the landowner. Quite clearly the primary threat to the Flixton Greenbelt is from Trafford Conservatives.

    It’s ridiculous

    Frankly, some of the Tory subterfuge has been pathetic. Who on earth came up with the plan to continue to describe the site as ‘Land adjacent to Flixton Station’? Did they really think we wouldn’t notice?

    It’s also irresponsible

    We desperately need the homes earmarked for Carrington, Trafford Waters, Pomona, Timperley. By including Flixton fields, we’re delaying the recovery and ultimately the development of Brownfield sites. This isn’t about houses, I would suggest it’s got more to do with the council’s financial predicament than anything else. This is about a land-sale. It’s about the council tax receipts. We know the Council is in a mess financially. Most metropolitan councils are in a mess. The Government has taken away half their income at a time of increasing demand on their services. We know all this. The solution should never be selling parks and common land. At best it gets the council through a few years, if they’re clever with the money.

    Two days before the full council, we had the Council’s Executive with a small item at the back of the agenda, “The Council’s approach to Investment Opportunities”. My suspicion is that Flixton Fields has more to do with the Investment Opportunities report than any of the spatial framework documents.

    The Bottom Line

    Flixton Fields were bought for health and recreation of that neighbourhood. They effectively provide a village green or common land at the centre of the town. They are are surrounded on all sides by residential development as the framework makes clear. They are like Clapham Common and no one would dream of selling Clapham Common. Trafford Tories should withdraw Flixton Fields from the plan and stop giving us the bulls__t about it being a consultation outside their control. They should get on with trying to get houses built where there’s already planning permission granted instead of trying to get in on the act one way or another from the capital receipt they gain from selling off commonly owned land.

  • Councillor’s Diary – Week Commencing 12th December

    Councillor’s Diary – Week Commencing 12th December

    Monday

    Last of the exam support sessions I’d volunteered for. Thoroughly rewarding.

    Meeting in the afternoon on an Over 50s Worklessness Pilot we’re scoping for Gorse Hill. It’s a Greater Manchester initiative and we’ve been chosen for Trafford. I’d be hugely interested in hearing resident’s experiences of jobseeking, returning to employment or access to training from within this generation.

    Tuesday

    Personal Development plan meeting at town hall. We identified time management and speed reading as areas to work upon. I also want to some job shadowing within areas of work.

    Meeting regarding public service reform and the proof of concept pilot work going on in our patch. I’m going to a larger meeting next week and it’s a subject that’s going to resurface.

    Labour meeting in the evening at the Robin Hood.

    Wednesday

    Cycle over to the Ecology Park. It’s looking superb. A lot of improvement work has taken place. Mike Ormerod, the CE of Greater Manchester Groundwork, raised a couple of issues. The brown road signs to the Ecology Park are looking tired. Totally support better signage to it, and really quite a lot more of it. The Trafford Park Metrolink will put more people in the area. The park is an absolute haven.

    An issue not as pleasant is the overnight parking and driver behaviour near to the park. It’s not appropriate that our streets are used as an open sewer. We need to put a stop to this. I’m sure the appropriate places like Truckstop do charge an amount some of the drivers would prefer to avoid.Trafford needs to get on top of it.

    Quick stop off at the Ravenswood gardens for the lantern parade. Couldn’t stay for the kids singing, a real shame. Wednesday was a lovely day though.

    Also had meetings at the town hall re scrutiny.

    Thursday

    But more work on the website. Think it’ll largely do for now.

    Library volunteering in the afternoon.

    Friday

    Kate Green coffee morning. Great community spirit is abroad in Stretford and it coalesced in the public hall. Afternoon, catching up on casework plus visit to library. Things have come to a head over leaf clearing on some of our streets. Took a trip out on bike to check out. The idea that you can keep cutting and not see a detrimental impact. Frankly, austerity isn’t working. It was fantasy economics abetted and applauded by the Lib Dems. At some point there’ll be recognition that the way to revive the economy is not too suck every last prop of social scaffolding from the village in which we live. I’m going to nag officers to get those streets swept but it’s just a sticking plaster. It’ll be somewhere else next week.

    Saturday

    Set off at half-ten to deliver newsletters in Flixton about the party’s position on the Flixton Fields that are under threat of development. Ended up staying in Flixton all day.

    These fields mean a lot to me. I’ve never lived in Flixton but so many of my school friends came from that way, it’s a place I know well. Flixton doesn’t really have formal parks but the fields do the job pretty well. Given I’ve never lived there and my teenage years are forty years gone, it’s incredible that the informal cut-throughs are still so familiar and unchanged, linking one side of Flixton with the other. That’s why I’m so determined that the fields should be preserved just as Urmston Council intended when it purchased them before the war.

    I’m no NIMBY, we desperately need houses. In fact generally, I’m perhaps more relaxed than most about building on the greenbelt. My passion is keeping the parks and fields that exist within the urban environment. We’ve lost too many. Here in this bit of Stretford we lost Kendal Road, we lost Urmston Grammar just up the road, we lost the fields to the Trafford Centre.

    I see why we protect greenbelt but it’s easy to get the balance wrong if we’re so obsessive in protecting it, we make the urban environment totally devoid of space to breathe. We’ve got to a point where scrubland classed as greenbelt by its location but offering none of the benefits, is given more protection than valued fields within an urban setting.

    I think it’s vital we protect Flixton’s fields. I’m delighted that Trafford’s Labour Group agree with me. In fact Andrew Western, our leader has really made this battle a priority. So it was an easy decision to stay all day in Flixton to support Andrew. He’s called an extraordinary meeting of council for Wednesday. It would be great if we can get unanimity across the parties on this. I think it’s one we can win. I certainly hope so.

  • Councillor’s Diary – Week Commencing 5th December

    Councillor’s Diary – Week Commencing 5th December

    Monday

    Start day at Lostock College being a ‘reader’ for a pupil on a maths paper. Surprisingly intense, you’re so keen that you don’t confuse or get in the way. Emotionally rewarding though, very much rooting for the pupil.

    Tea-time meeting with Trafford officers looking at the shaping of Trafford in the next few years. Came away not really the wiser. There was a feeling that the Mersey Valley was less valued than it should be which  is something I actually agree with, but there was also an evangelical fervour that the Mersey Valley could be used to create a unifying Trafford identity.

    I’ve got to be honest, I’ve lived within the current boundaries of Trafford for pretty much all my life, but I don’t self define as a Traffordian. I’m a Manc and the part of Manchester I come from is Stretford. Trafford has no real meaning to me except as the name of those current administrative boundaries.

    I don’t know what the motivation is for officers seeing the lack  of a Trafford identity as a bad thing. I look across at Salford, a place with which I have numerous connections. Salford has a self identity that is almost too obsessive; and its tendency to frame everything in terms of its relationship with Manchester in my view holds it back.

    I want to see greater use of the Mersey Valley just because it’s a beautiful space and far more accessible than a lot of people realise. If I shop in Altrincham, it won’t be out of a fabricated construct that my ‘Trafford identity’ locks me in to choosing there rather than choosing Manchester.

    Labour group next meeting in the evening. The big political issue is the Flixton Village green area scheduled by Greater Manchester for building upon. We’re fully behind residents who want to protect this as their village green. And it’s interesting to compare our support for a genuine connection and relationship between Flixton and the fields at the centre of their town, to the marketing candy floss I encountered from officers at the earlier meeting.

    Tuesday

    Regular Meeting with Corporate Team for Economic Growth

    Budget scrutiny – risk assessments superficial and impact vague. Some of these measures seem to be suck it and see. For example, the garden waste charge – no idea of take up or impact on fly tipping.

    Wednesday

    Scribing at Lostock College for another maths exam.

    Locality partnership enabling groups review. A big proportion of my time is spent on the locality partnership. I’m not sure I know whether it’s productive as it could be.

    Budget scrutiny day2

    Looking at reablement. There’s insufficient funding. It’s a national problem. These are genuinely scary times.

    Thursday

    Volunteering Lostock Library

    Spatial framework Q&A at Urmston Grammar. This is the big meeting about Flixton Village Green. Packed meeting-I don’t know whether the meeting really captured the extent to which these fields are valued and loved by the townsfolk of Flixton. I know those fields from my own schooldays and those fields truly are part of the Flixton identity. It would be tragic for the fields to be lost to housing. Questions and answers tend towards a more adversarial contest. I would have preferred simply making the case that the fields are walked and loved and de-stress the folk of Flixton just as they have done for a hundred years or so.

    Friday

    Transport for Greater Manchester Committee

    Sunday

    Trip with Laurence around the United game. I’m always struck by the paucity of the collective offer we make to United fans. They’re expected to eat over-priced takeaway junk, with nowhere to sit or perch their food. I’ve been to Second Division grounds where the town makes more of an effort. It’s squalid, there’s no imagination employed and we expect United fans to treat our neighbourhoods with respect. The only improvement I saw was that United had put out some picnic tables. It’s a start, but there’s so much more United could do, so much more the council could do and so much more the businesses could do.

  • Councillor’s Diary – Week Commencing 13th November

    Councillor’s Diary – Week Commencing 13th November

    Monday 13th November

    Update Meeting on Stretford Public Realm

    What can I say? I don’t want to lose the subways, I use them. I do want the speed limit reduced in Stretford, so that’s something, but I’m more than underwhelmed. It still feels like an 8-2 win for the car driver. Perhaps it’s the best that can be achieved. I’ve signed the petition to halt the proposals.

    From a tweet
    Imagine if Stretford’s subways looked like this, instead of being filled in

    Petition launched to make ‘killer A56 road safer.

    Tuesday 14th November

    Budget Executive

    School Crossing Patrol’s scrapped, Garden Waste collections scrapped unless you’re willing to pay and we’re still £2m quid short, even after we’ve hiked up council tax.

    We’ve been saying this has been coming, we’ve known about the Graph of Doom for 6 years or so. Next year will be even worse than this year.

    I suppose you could argue that people are not going to march on the gates of the palace over the issue of garden waste collections, but it seems to me that we’re heading to a point where councils have withdrawn from many ordinary people’s lives.

    In Bury they’ve gone to three weekly collections. On the current trajectory we’ll have to do the same before too many years. Bury now have private companies touting for the trade. So those that can pay, get a better service than those that can’t in a basic service like waste collection. Before long those that pay will be wondering why they have to pay council tax, why can’t they just pay for the services they use? The fact that I can even imagine the question being asked shows how far we’ve descended.

    busybins

    Wednesday 15th November

    Scrutiny Meeting

    First item Budget, Second item Trafford Leisure…We took a long time over the budget. The main theme was the importance of growth in housing and business to the council’s income. On the whole, I am largely in agreement with the need to build. I am wholly opposed to building on greenspace central and core to a neighbourhood, such as Station Road Green (referred to last week in the diary) and the large Flixton Village Greens area, but given that the need for housing is the major source of my weekly casework, I have to make the case for housing in places that are not so core, such as Pomona and Trafford Waters. People will disagree, but they need to show me where they will build.

    Trafford Leisure, big issue – we could lose George Carnall Sports Centre. We’re suffering as a nation from inactivity and obesity … talk of being cleverer … targeting… getting people active … social prescribing … yet we’re making the journeys to school less safe and prioritising the car whenever we’re given the option.

    I’m being a bit bleak tonight aren’t I?

    Thursday 17th November

    Library volunteering and more housing casework

    Friday 18th November

    Signing off for a few days as daughter and son in law due to visit from America