Category: Blog

  • Should we care about insects?

    Should we care about insects?

    It hardly made the news. Relegated to sixth item on Thursday’s 6am BBC news, not even mentioned on the preceding ‘Farming Today’. If it wasn’t for the Guardian putting it onto their frontpage, maybe the BBC wouldn’t have mentioned it at all.

    The news that German Scientists had revealed a 75% reduction in flying insects since the 80s was greeted essentially with a shrug.

    I’m no scientist, but I do know we need insects, that a 75% reduction is beyond serious; and that the most likely culprit is man. It therefore follows that we need to do something about it, …but probably won’t.

    The EU has been struggling to comprehensively ban neonicotinoids against an alliance of Tory MEPs, German industrial giants – Bayer (largest manufacturers of neonicotinoids) and the industrial farming lobby.

    I’m proud that the Labour Party manifesto committed a future Labour Government to ban these filthy neonicotinoids. We need to go further though.

    Buglife, the conservation organisation committed to invertebrates, put together its own manifesto in 2014 and it still looks credible today.

    We do need a comprehensive strategy though and quick. I think the direction will have to come from the EU. The UK’s Tory Government is in a state of collective psychosis and the US has Donald Trump. Insects really matter.

    Photo by Oktavianus Mulyadi:

    Pexels: horsefly-on-a-pink-violet-flower-petals-14583889/

  • Understanding University Academy 92 – The Campus

    Understanding University Academy 92 – The Campus

    Gary Neville’s University plans at core of a revised Stretford Masterplan

    What are the plans, what are the risks?

    The University itself

    Big launch, lots of photo-opportunities, noisy videos, but what do we really know of the plans?

    ..and what is the UA92 vision actually about?

    Universities have traditionally placed academic learning at the core of the curriculum, supported by character development for the world of work. By comparison, UA92 will deliver a curriculum with employability and character development at the core wrapped around by academic development.

    There’s lots of talk of character and striving and success and goals, but beyond buzz words we still know very little about the university itself. We know that Lancaster University (University of the Year 2017!) are backing the project and they intend to give more information in the new year about the curriculum.

    There could be up to 7000 students enrolled ultimately at the campus, but there’s also a lot of talk of paid placements. It would be helpful to understand the nature of these placements, whether they’re local placements or whether they’re global; and the interaction with the University whilst on those placements.

    Not really a planning consideration, but in terms of understanding the economic regeneration and sustainability of all this, I want to get a better idea of how many students will need to be housed locally, where they’re from, and what their spending power is.

    There will be opportunities for local businesses, for voluntary sector, for existing educational institutions. I really want to learn more.

    The Talbot Road Campus itself

    Trafford Council have already purchased the site. Currently, it’s the Kelloggs HQ but Kelloggs are moving to Media City. It’s a big and valuable site. My understanding is that Trafford will be the landlords and are already committed to refurbishing the building. There’ll be a new sports centre/swimming pool built on site (top right of map) to replace Stretford Sports Centre.

    This sports centre probably deserves its own article; users are understandably worried about provision at the new centre, will it be more difficult to book a court? Will the university be making block bookings and residents picking up what’s left? It is some reassurance that Trafford Leisure will be operating the centre, but I want to be certain that this will meet the community’s need. I’m trying to get a consultation event organised at Stretford Sports Centre dedicated to the transfer of sports provision to the new site.

    My Questions

    • What is Trafford Council’s exposure to risk on the refurbishment of the Kelloggs building?
    • As landlord of the Kelloggs building, what is our exposure to ongoing financial committment?
    • What happens if the University fails? Implications for Trafford Council and Leisure Trust?
    • How does the proposed hotel and 150 apartments proposed for the UA92 campus site fit in with the university – are these serious proposals or just something marking time until further announcements
    • The new Stretford Masterplan identifies 84 Talbot Road for development but no other sites beyond the K site, why is this when there seems a number of sites further down Talbot Road ripe for development including the old bowling green etc?
    • What guarantees have residents that the new sport centre will be able to cope with the increased demand generated by improved and new facilities as well as the increased student population on site?
    • How will the Leisure Trust consult users about what needs to go in the new centre?
    • University Campuses are usually 24hr operations – to what extent will this apply at UA92?
    • What arrangements are being considered for cycling and walking routes from Stretford to the campus?
    • Gorse Hill already suffers notable neglect from some private landlords, will you now introduce a landlord licensing scheme, such as has proved so successful in Newham and other boroughs?
    • What’s the intention for the current sports centre site?
  • A light shines on Private Landlords and their Tax Dodges (sadly in London!)

    A light shines on Private Landlords and their Tax Dodges (sadly in London!)

    Up to 13,000 landlords in one east London borough have failed to declare their rental income to the Government, the local council has found.

    Local Gov News 14th August 2017

    We only know this because Newham has a compulsory landlord registration scheme. In Trafford there is no landlord registration scheme. We don’t know who they are and there is no desire from the Tories to do anything about it.

    We already suffer enough blights from the private landlords and their lack of care. The fact that it seems likely there’s as little attention to their tax affairs as there is to the neighbourhoods in which they operate is another reason we need a Labour council to get on top of this.

    Pay Your Taxes – Hold Your Head High” by Andrew Sorensen, CC BY-NC 2.0

  • Greater Manchester Mayor – Andy Burnham 100 days

    Greater Manchester Mayor – Andy Burnham 100 days

    Jen Williams is continually showing that great journalism doesn’t have to be London based. It’s worth reading the linked article from the Manchester Evening News.

    On the mayor, I haven’t changed my view. Only someone of the stature of Andy Burnham has a chance of making it work. But it’s still going to be difficult.

    There are hurdles to surmount. There’s no doubt about that.

    The Tory Government has lost its will to do anything much at all collectively and is showing all the signs of being totally dysfunctional – it should be in special measures. And that makes the devolution agenda far harder.

    The council leaders across Greater Manchester (with two perhaps 3 exceptions*) are incredibly secure in their positions. I’m sure that fact creates its own dynamic.

    * I’m less concerned that a council is predominantly ruled by one party, that’s just electoral geography. It’s reasonable to ask though how the parties select and sustain their leader over the decades. There’s an argument that only Salford has a transparent process with its City Mayor. I just float that mischievous thought…. Discuss


  • Some Current Casework

    Some Current Casework

    Just a flavour of some of my current casework. I’ve removed names from an email I’ve sent.

    Euroterminal

    I’ve been approached separately by a few people regarding increased noise, particularly in evenings and night. There seems to be increased noise from stationery trains close to the football stadium. This will be exclusively at night I guess as the trains will be on the main line there and awaiting siding at the EuroTerminal.

    Do we have a liaison with the EuroTerminal Management? I remember it was a big issue before I became a Councillor but has largely been managed well since. It is just this year that it has begun to resurface.

    Dog Poo

    Raglan/Melville/Sevenways

    Always an issue but has increased as a nuisance on the Raglan/Melville/Sevenways triangle. It is not an area of the ward that has ever been prioritised for ‘Be Responsible’ activity, but seems to be a big issue at the moment and has been raised by a few neighbours.

    Streetlights

    On my same Raglan Road; they’re metal and rusty. Is it programmed to paint these legacy columns here and elsewhere? Alternatively, is the intention to let them degrade until they can be replaced with LED bearing columns?

    Mobikes and Manchester United

    Steve Pyer (Mobike UK) gave a presentation to TfGMC this morning.  The conversation moved onto Manchester United/Manchester City; and it seemed apparent that Mobike had a rather out of date idea of crowd flow at these events. They were assuming bikes and crowds don’t mix because essentially it was a stationery crush. My experience is that even for the biggest matches there is always flow in crowd movement; and actually for mobikes in particular compared to a racing bike, there is scope for putting these in the mix. At both stadia there’s supporters who do use bikes City have better facilities but United still have some users. Mobike is already in North Trafford whether officially or not and their management recognise that. I’m hoping that we can encourage more.

    Speed Calming; The Fiveways junction (Park Road/Davyhulme Road)

    Continues to be an issue. For some reason that slight decline towards the railway bridge encourages excessive acceleration. I have been contacted by a young resident on Park Road.

    There’s a case for a speed trap/speed indicator device and for improved sequencing.

    Davyhulme Road/Moss Road Spar

    The issue of the parking place accessible only by reversing directly onto a pelican crossing is still unresolved. There was a dispute between traffic management and planning enforcement. My understanding that there wasn’t a planning condition attached to the original change of use but there was on the installation of an ATM. Either way it is falling between two stools and not being resolved.

    Speed calming Rowsley Road

    I’ve had two separate calls for speed calming on Rowsley Road between Chatsworth Road and Barton Road. It’s surprised me because it doesn’t look particularly like a rat run, but that does indeed seem to be happening.

    Moss Road

    There’s a vehicle repair business spilling onto the road. There’s permanently vehicles parked there. I have received complaints that there’s speeding and untidiness. Clearly there’s more residents using this road with the new development on the College site. The speeding might not always be associated with the business but is an issue I’ve seen for myself.

    Photo by Ksenia Chernaya: overhead-shot-of-a-person-using-a-tablet-7695250

  • Scrutiny – July 2017

    Scrutiny – July 2017

    Scrutiny

    Our first scrutiny meeting of the council year was on Wednesday last week.

    • 2017/18 Scrutiny Committee Work Programme
    • Executive’s Response to the Task & Finish Group Review into the Education, Health & Care Plan (EHCP) Process in Trafford
    • Executive’s Response to the Task and Finish Group Review of the Joint Venture Contract between Trafford Council and Amey
    • ADP Report (2016/17 Quarter Four)
    • Discussion on the 2018/19 Budget Scrutiny Process
    • Fire Safety within Trafford
    • Crisis Capability Management
    • Task and Finish Group Prioritising Tasks

    Scrutiny is often about small gains/changes. The hard truth is if you want to make a real difference, you need to win elections and it’s now 15 years since we came out of an election in Trafford with Labour in overall control.

    Nevertheless, we had a couple of small such wins last night resulting from work we did in the last municipal year:

    1. Trafford’s Conservative Cabinet recognised there’d been deficiencies in their delivery of EHCPs and had given assurances.
    2. Scrutiny are not going to surprise anyone with our
      concern over the state of streets and parks, but we’re pleased that there will now be regular reports to the executive on performance.

      At least councillors will begin to see the overall
      performance recorded rather than just having to chase specific jobs.

    The issue of responding to customer complaints of fly-tipping, litter bins overflowing, pot holes, grass not being cut etc. will continue to be a focus in the coming year. We have it on our workplan to look at Trafford’s CRM system. We know that it’s a constant frustration if things are reported and the work is either not done or marked as completed without feedback. The interaction with other computer systems is also an issue.

    Labour members were keen that Clean Air be a topic for a task and finish group. Conservatives said it was an issue about which nothing could be done.

    This is why it’s so important that Trafford becomes a Labour Council. We’ve got to challenge and change the way we live our lives if it’s killing us.

    We can’t just shrug our shoulders and say nothing can be done. There’s actually quite a lot that could be done to improve air quality. It’s not just an issue of power stations not yet built.

    So anyhow, our topics for this year will be

    • Trafford’s CRM system,
    • Services provided to Schools by Trafford,
    • Loneliness

    All are worthwhile, it’s vital that we get the right scope at the beginning for each topic.

    Addendum – Property Rush – Easy Money for Councils?

    How can you scrutinise when everything is going to be great?
    On Thursday, I took the train to Preston for a meeting of the regional scrutiny network.

    The main focus was a presentation by Shaer Halewood of Oldham Council on scrutiny of commercialisation activity. Many councils are buying up property for income generation. (Councils bet billions on property purchases)

    It’s a real challenge for Scrutiny and for Audit. How do we ensure the council is not exposed to undue risk. How do we assess risk levels of commercial deals when they are shrouded in commercial confidentiality clauses?

    Trafford issued a report in December on its approach to this.
    Investment Opportunities Report

    And it’s intention to set up an an investment company in managing its property portfolio.

    Report 2

    We’re now moving to a position where Trafford are exploring potential acquisitions as per the decision of the executive 26 June and there’s a real challenge to cut through.

    Property development can be lucrative but as the Times article linked to above points out, so can be the 2:30 at Ascot. And if it goes wrong, “services will have to be slashed harder and taxes put up more”.

    It was a really worthwhile scrutiny network meeting.