Category: Blog

  • Some Current Casework

    Some Current Casework

    Just a flavour of some of my current casework. I’ve removed names from an email I’ve sent.

    Euroterminal – I’ve been approached separately by a few people regarding increased noise, particularly in evenings and night. There seems to be increased noise from stationery trains close to the football stadium. This will be exclusively at night I guess as the trains will be on the main line there and awaiting siding at the EuroTerminal. Do we have a liaison with the EuroTerminal Management? I remember it was a big issue before I became a Councillor but has largely been managed well since. It is just this year that it has begun to resurface.

    Dog Poo Raglan/Melville/Sevenway– Always an issue but has increased as a nuisance on the Raglan/Melville/Sevenways triangle. It is not an area of the ward that has ever been prioritised for ‘Be Responsible’ activity but seems to be a big issue at the moment and has been raised by a few neighbours

    Streetlights on the same Raglan Road – they’re metal and rusty – is it programmed to paint these legacy columns here and elsewhere or is the intention to let them degrade until they can be replaced with LED bearing columns?

    Mobikes and Manchester United – Steve Pyer (Mobike UK) gave a presentation to TfGMC this morning.  The conversation moved onto Manchester United/Manchester City and it seemed apparent that Mobike had a rather out of date idea of crowd flow at these events. They were assuming bikes and crowds don’t mix because essentially it was a stationery crush. My experience is that even for the biggest matches there is always flow in crowd movement and actually for mobikes in particular compared to a racing bike, there is scope for putting these in the mix. At both stadia there’s supporters who do use bikes – City have better facilities but United still have some users. Mobike is already in North Trafford whether officially or not and their management recognise that. I’m hoping that we can encourage more.

    Speed Calming; The Fiveways junction (Park Road/Davyhulme Road) continues to be an issue. For some reason that slight decline towards the railway bridge encourages excessive acceleration. I have been contacted by a young resident on Park Road……… There’s a case for a speed trap/speed indicator device and for improved sequencing.

    Davyhulme Road/Moss Road Spar – the issue of the parking place accessible only by reversing directly onto a pelican crossing is still unresolved. There was a dispute between traffic management and planning enforcement. My understanding that there wasn’t a planning condition attached to the original change of use but there was on the installation of an ATM. Either way it is falling between two stools and not being resolved.

    Speed calming – Rowsley Road – I’ve had two separate calls for speed calming on Rowsley Road between Chatstworth Road and Barton Road. It’s surprised me because it doesn’t look particularly like a rat run, but that does indeed seem to be happening.

    Moss Road – There’s a vehicle repair business spilling onto the road. There’s permanently vehicles parked there. I have received complaints that there’s speeding and untidiness. Clearly there’s more residents using this road with the new development on the College site. The speeding might not always be associated with the business but is an issue I’ve seen for myself.

  • Scrutiny – July 2017

    Scrutiny – July 2017

    Scrutiny

    Our first scrutiny meeting of the council year was on Wednesday last week.

    • 2017/18 Scrutiny Committee Work Programme
    • Executive’s Response to the Task & Finish Group Review into the Education, Health & Care Plan (EHCP) Process in Trafford
    • Executive’s Response to the Task and Finish Group Review of the Joint Venture Contract between Trafford Council and Amey
    • ADP Report (2016/17 Quarter Four)
    • Discussion on the 2018/19 Budget Scrutiny Process
    • Fire Safety within Trafford
    • Crisis Capability Management
    • Task and Finish Group Prioritising Tasks

    Scrutiny is often about small gains/changes. The hard truth is if you want to make a real difference, you need to win elections and it’s now 15 years since we came out of an election in Trafford with Labour in overall control.
    Nevertheless we had a couple of small such wins last night resulting from work we did in the last municipal year:

    1. Trafford’s Conservative Cabinet recognised there’d been deficiencies
      in their delivery of EHCPs and had given assurances in terms of
    2. Scrutiny are not going to surprise anyone with our
      concern over the state of streets and parks but we’re pleased
      that there will now be regular reports to the executive on
      performance. At least councillors will begin to see the overall
      performance recorded rather than just having to chase specific jobs.

    The issue of responding to customer complaints of fly-tipping, litter bins overflowing, pot holes, grass not being cut etc. will continue to be a focus in the coming year. We have it on our workplan to look at Trafford’s CRM system. We know that it’s a constant frustration if things are reported and the work is either not done or marked as completed without feedback. The interaction with other computer systems is also an issue.

    Labour members were keen that Clean Air be a topic for a task and finish group. Conservatives said it was an issue about which nothing could be done.

    This is why it’s so important that Trafford becomes a Labour Council. We’ve got to challenge and change the way we live our lives if it’s killing us. We can’t just shrug our shoulders and say nothing can be done. There’s actually quite a lot that could be done to improve air quality. It’s not just an issue of power stations not yet built.

    So anyhow, our topics for this year will be

    1. Trafford’s CRM system,
    2. Services provided to Schools by Trafford,
    3. Loneliness

    All are worthwhile, it’s vital that we get the right scope at the beginning for each topic.

    Addendum – Property Rush – Easy Money for Councils?

    Trump

    How can you scrutinise when everything is going to be great?

    On Thursday, I took the train to Preston for a meeting of the regional scrutiny network.

    The main focus was a presentation by Shaer Halewood of Oldham Council on scrutiny of commercialisation activity. Many councils are buying up property for income generation. (Councils bet billions on property purchases)

    It’s a real challenge for Scrutiny and for Audit. How do we ensure the council is not exposed to undue risk. How do we assess risk levels of commercial deals when they are shrouded in commercial confidentiality clauses?

    Trafford issued a report in December on its approach to this.
    https://democratic.trafford.gov.uk/documents/s17341/Investment%20Opportunities%20Report.pdf
    And it’s intention to set up an an investment company in managing its property portfolio.
    Report 2

    We’re now moving to a position where Trafford are exploring potential acquisitions as per the decision of the executive 26 June and there’s a real challenge to cut through.

    Property development can be lucrative but as the Times article linked to above points out, so can be the 2:30 at Ascot. And if it goes wrong, “services will have to be slashed harder and taxes put up more”.

    It was a really worthwhile scrutiny network meeting.

  • Agent

    Agent

    18th April 11am – Anne Duffield calls me “Have you seen the news? Theresa is going for the 8th June!”

    “Oh ****!”

    We’re already campaigning hard for Andy Burnham for Mayor and over in Altrincham for a council by-election. The polls are abysmal; and worse… I’m on record as wanting an early General Election.

    I’ve been the lone voice arguing for months that Labour should be on the front foot demanding Theresa May calls an early election. The Tories haven’t got a mandate for the Brexit they’re pursuing and the electorate needs to speak. Theresa May is effectively using the same argument, except we’re on the back-foot. The polls are just about as bad they could be.

    As parliament is still sitting, we won’t see Kate until the weekend. Meanwhile the media are on hyperdrive, searching for stories of discord, or making them up. We don’t yet know how the party will confirm candidates. The assumption is that it’ll be straight-forward, but the press are hoping for something more messy. It turns out that even losing candidates from 2015 will be able to be a candidate again in 2017 without a full selection. Not totally convinced that this is the right approach. Clearly we haven’t the resources or time to go through a full selection everywhere. but where the candidate lost, I think it’s reasonable to ask the question whether someone else could do better. The Tories strangely seem to be in the same predicament. I use the word ‘strangely’ since they called the election, yet they don’t seem ready for it.

    By the first weekend, we’re pretty much set. Kate had indicated who her campaign team would be long before the election was called. Me as agent, Tom as campaign manager, Ita and Bernice running members/distribution and Morris Hall. We just need to settle on a campaign budget. I’m figuring that as things stand, it’s going to have to be more than last time (2015) when we were twinned to help Warrington South and additionally the general election coincided with local elections. The polls are far worse and we’re on our own as far as a twinning strategy is concerned. Kate is extremely popular, Tory run Trafford Council is extremely unpopular, and deservedly so, particularly in the north of the borough. We’re hearing some voters saying they won’t vote Labour because of Jeremy Corbyn, others are enthusiastic because of him. The bottom line is that the polls put us at our lowest for a generation, which suggests we’ll have to work for every vote.

    Our membership is huge, we’ve got recently joined members who are full of energy and determination. We’ve got a common goal of winning as many seats as possible. Labour is an incredibly powerful force when it pulls together, so there’s a real onus on the campaign to be inclusive and not to operate in cliques.

    We need to get Broadheath by-election out of the way, so we can begin a bit of canvassing. Tom can begin drafting and getting the orders in for our leaftlets etc.

    I’m keen that we start using the doorstep app which is a canvassing tool for smartphones. I’ve been on a few canvass sessions in Broadheath where we have had so many helpers that I’ve found I’ve spent most of the time waiting to be allocated a door to knock or waiting to have the info recorded. It just seems obvious to me that having the info on a phone means I could just be getting on with it.

    Others are sceptical. I get consent to try it out in Gorse Hill Ward.

    First time on the Doorstep App, it doesn’t work. I can’t log in.

    Second time, it’s me and Kate on Auburn Ave in Lostock. We operate like overlapping fullbacks and the app works perfectly. If we’d had to share a clipboard, it would have been slow going. Too big a team and it’s easy to just chat to other canvassers. Too small and it’s the person with the board with nothing to do.

    It’s good that Kate is an early adopter of the technology. Without her blessing I doubt we’d have used it to such good effect throughout the campaign. The ‘App’ became a big thing here in this campaign, in other constituencies, less so.

    By election Broadheath / Andy Burnham Mayor May 4

    Suddenly everything looks a little bit rosier. The election of Andy Burnham has been overwhelming across Trafford. He’s won every ward in Stretford and Urmston by a landslide. Amy Whyte has had a fantastic victory in Broadheath. There’s a spring in everyone’s step.

    The Launch

    My next task is to get the official nomination of Kate submitted. But first we need to launch the campaign. A handy place to get the ten signatures we need. I’m dead keen to include newer activists who’ve been working hard both here and in Broadheath. I think we only had one Councillor on the list. I was pleased with the list of people nominating Kate.

    By the way, who’s the Conservative Candidate?

    As nominations open, we still don’t know who the Conservatives have chosen to be their candidate. We know it’s not going to be Sean Anstee because we’ve asked him. We know that at least one Trafford Conservative councillor applied to be their candidate in Tatton, and another is candidate in Liverpool Walton but nobody will tell us who their candidate is in Stretford and Urmston. I wouldn’t say we’re panicking over it, but this is new. Kate tells me that there’s a feeling amongst colleagues that the Conservative campaign is going to be largely under the radar. We know the Conservatives outspent Labour massively in 2015 on Social Media. Perhaps that’s going to be the nature of this campaign although it seems strange that there’s nothing going on on their local websites.

    Even Thursday’s Messenger hasn’t been given the name of the Tory Candidate although it’s got both the Lib Dems and ours. We eventually confirm that it’s Lisa Cooke who’s been chosen. It’s someone we know since she fought the seat back in 2015 but I’d not heard anything from her since to suggest she was still active in the Conservative Party politics.

    Edit with the Benefit of Hindsight

    Over the next few days, we come to realise that this tactic of making the campaign all about Theresa May rather than individual candidates was pretty much universal. There’s images from all over the country of direct mail sent in the name of the prime minister asking for support. The actual local candidate just gets a brief mention. Given that Theresa May wouldn’t debate or even meet ordinary voters, it is a great relief to myself as a democrat that the tactic would eventually prove so abysmally unsuccessful.

    The mood lifts…

    I guess everyone has their own moment where it began to change. This was mine. Emily Thornbury visibly demolishing and diminishing Michael Fallon on prime telly was the point where I began to think we’re coming back into this.

    Our manifesto has gone down well, the Tory manifesto is a disaster. Unprecedented for U-turns on a manifesto before election day. ‘Nothing has changed, Nothing has changed!’ Theresa May is sinking with her ship.

    Everything gets put in Perspective

    Leaflets, stuffing, sorting, Delivering, Phoning

    The pause in the election brought home how much work we’d all been doing. An election campaign is a huge operation even at constituency level. So many people working hard for change. We had an incredible amount of people helping Kate and Labour and Jeremy. It was a fantastically unified campaign amongst those who were taking part in the campaign. It didn’t matter what wing of the party, or what was the political motivation, we worked together.

    It’s something the Tories will never match

    The Count

    Finally got to see some Tories. Just a few turned up from Stretford and Urmston. We’re pretty sure that they did nothing apart from a single leaflet posted by the Royal Mail. Hugely annoyed that their vote went up by a 1000 votes. It sticks in my craw that a party that took so little notice of its own voters during an election should increase its vote.

    Thankfully, Jeremy Corbyn’s/Kate’s/Labour vote increased by nearly 9000 votes. Everyone deserves a share of this. It was similar across Greater Manchester and the North West. The picture on the other side of The Pennines seems totally different. My own view is that within Labour, we have many on that side of the country legitimising the Brexit/Ukip message when we should be challenging it. It’s a risky game because the chances are that the east of the country will be worst affected by Brexit.

    swing

    After the election

    The expenses are tallied and submitted. Thankfully we were never a marginal seat with shadow Ministers and Battlebuses dropping in. Thankfully too, I don’t have to reimburse the shoe leather sacrificed by our members and supporters. If we did have to repay all the volunteers I think I’d have been overspent before a single letter was printed. Many thanks too everyone and I’d wholeheartedly recommend it if you ever get the chance to be agent.

  • Everything is Fine at Trafford Council!

    Everything is Fine at Trafford Council!

    Things are getting really bad in Trafford!

    The honest assessment as I see it is that Trafford is almost at breaking point.

    You've seen the figures that show delayed discharges from hospital put Trafford in the bottom two of the league table for the whole country. Those are real figures, not some tame consultancy's award.

    Those figures are more indicative of how Trafford is performing than any amount of corporate propaganda. And the effect is shortened lives as we all know.

    This hasn't happened overnight. It's been the product of the coalition's long term economic plan sacrificing local services and Labour's been shouting it for years.

    Trafford's problem is that it started the cuts from such a low base. And having Tories in control has meant a culture of denial. Just keep telling everyone that all is well and they won't notice.

    But senior officers do know and reputationally, the signs are there that working at Trafford is no longer the plum job it once was. All the corporate directors from even five years ago have either left, leaving or have tried to leave. Trafford no longer seems to be attracting the best from outside and increasingly promotes from within, which can work, but obviously lessens its ability to refresh.

    Things are dire. The visible signs are there for all to see It would be easy to put the blame on our private sector 'partner', Amey for the state of our roads and parks. Indeed Amey Plc are a symptom of that sort of global private equity me, me, me, greed that's beset us, but Sean Anstee's Tories have to take the real blame.

    The Tories have relied upon throwing a few crumbs out to wards they need to keep voting Tory. And they paint an implied, and often explicit threat that because Labour says it will try to be fair in its policies, that will somehow be worse for Tory voters.

    It's a proven electoral strategy and it doesn't cost them very much in 'crumbs'. When you look at Davyhulme, Flixton, Sale, you see it really is crumbs. The cake goes to Hale and Bowdon.

    It's almost satire that Hale is having millions spent on its new library, Where's the business case in social value terms, especially given the proximity to Altrincham? – (also getting a new library)

    I'm angry that my town, my neighbourhood is getting such a raw deal. I'm frustrated that that the Flixton and Davyhulme's don't demand the same 'cake' that goes to Hale and Bowdon. Why don't they ask where are Flixton and Davyhulme's libraries? Will there ever be a breaking point?

    I look across at a Tory Party in total denial as to Trafford's plight.

    Comfortably Numb in their indolence.

  • Poisonous to say; but I thought Tony Blair was pretty good on 'Marr' this morning.

  • Flixton Fields Council Meeting – Don’t let them tell you it’s about houses

    Flixton Fields Council Meeting – Don’t let them tell you it’s about houses

    On 21st December, Trafford Labour’s Council Meeting we’d called to oppose fields in Flixton being designated for development.

    It was a vital meeting. The submission by Trafford of these fields at Flixton for inclusion within the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework has not been adequately explained. Residents are outraged that something so intrinsically part of Flixton and central to their village is being sacrificed for development.

    A council keeping its residents in the dark

    We need houses and business development. We all agree on that.

    This is not about housing though. We are still not getting the full picture about the Flixton Fields submission. I find it abhorrent that even after the full Council meeting we’re still being strung along. I’ve never heard such specious argument in favour of a proposal. If there is an argument for including Flixton Fields, it certainly is not the one that the Tories are putting forward.

    The insertion of Flixton Fields into the proposal has been blind-side operation by Trafford from the off. Less than two months ago the Greater Manchester Combined Authority published (31st October) the results of its ‘Call for Sites’. As you can see below, the extent to which developers had ambitions on Flixton was minimal.

    Land adjacent to Flixton Station
    Land adjacent to Flixton Station

    At the exact same time this is being published, we also have the Draft Spatial Framework. So the narrative is this:

    We’ve asked you and the Developer Industry to point to sites you think should be built upon,
    and you gave us this.
    But, we don’t want to give you that, we want to give you this;
    and its for your own protection!

    Listen to Sean Anstee on the video of the council meeting (about 12mins in). The amount of times he talks in terms of doing this to control the insatiable hunger of developers, to make sure we get the infrastructure, schools, highways, public transport in place first etc. You need to remind yourself that this hasn’t been put forward by developers, then remind yourself who the landowner is. Nothing can happen unless the council chooses to sell, but it’s the council who is both the proposer and the landowner. Quite clearly the primary threat to the Flixton Greenbelt is from Trafford Conservatives.

    It’s ridiculous

    Frankly, some of the Tory subterfuge has been pathetic. Who on earth came up with the plan to continue to describe the site as ‘Land adjacent to Flixton Station’? Did they really think we wouldn’t notice?

    It’s also irresponsible

    We desperately need the homes earmarked for Carrington, Trafford Waters, Pomona, Timperley. By including Flixton fields, we’re delaying the recovery and ultimately the development of Brownfield sites. This isn’t about houses, I would suggest it’s got more to do with the council’s financial predicament than anything else. This is about a land-sale. It’s about the council tax receipts. We know the Council is in a mess financially. Most metropolitan councils are in a mess. The Government has taken away half their income at a time of increasing demand on their services. We know all this. The solution should never be selling parks and common land. At best it gets the council through a few years, if they’re clever with the money.

    Two days before the full council, we had the Council’s Executive with a small item at the back of the agenda, “The Council’s approach to Investment Opportunities”. My suspicion is that Flixton Fields has more to do with the Investment Opportunities report than any of the spatial framework documents.

    The Bottom Line

    Flixton Fields were bought for health and recreation of that neighbourhood. They effectively provide a village green or common land at the centre of the town. They are are surrounded on all sides by residential development as the framework makes clear. They are like Clapham Common and no one would dream of selling Clapham Common. Trafford Tories should withdraw Flixton Fields from the plan and stop giving us the bulls__t about it being a consultation outside their control. They should get on with trying to get houses built where there’s already planning permission granted instead of trying to get in on the act one way or another from the capital receipt they gain from selling off commonly owned land.